Wednesday, November 10, 2010

The Necessity of Baptism

For some background info, a few months ago someone left a comment on my blog to check out their blog.  I have been for the past couple of months now.  One big thing I noticed was that this guy seems pretty legalistic in his views, especially on salvation and what baptism has to do with it. 

The following is from a big book called "Systematic Theology", by Wayne Grudem, which is a book I recommend to be on anyones' bookshelf if they want to seriously study Christian theology.  I agree with what this book has to say on the subject, and if you agree or disagree I would love if you would leave a comment explaining why.

"While we recognize that Jesus commanded baptism (Matt. 28:19), as did the apostles (Acts 2:38), we should not say that baptism is necessary for salvation."..."To say that baptism or any other action is necessary for salvation is to say that we are not justified by faith alone, but by faith plus a certain "work," the work of baptism.  The apostle Paul would have opposed the idea that baptism is necessary for salvation just as strongly as he opposed the similar idea that circumcision was necessary for salvation (see Gal. 5:1-12)

Those who argue that baptism is necessary for salvation often point to Mark 16:16 "He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned."  But the very evident answer to this is simply to say that the verse says nothing about those who believe and are not baptized.  The verse is simply talking about general cases without making a pedantic qualification for the unusual case of someone who believes and is not baptized.  But certainly the verse should not be pressed into service and mad to speak of something it is not talking about.

More to the point is Jesus' statement to the dying thief on the cross, "Today you will be with me in Paradise" (Luke 23:43).  The thief could not be baptized before he died on the cross, but he was certainly saved that day.  Moreover, the force of this point cannot be evaded by arguing that the thief was saved under the old covenant (under which baptism was not necessary to salvation), because the new covenant took effect at the death of Jesus (see Heb. 9:17), and Jesus died beforeeither of the two thieves who were crucified with him (see John 19:32-33).

Another reason why baptism is not necessary for salvation is that our justification from sins takes place at the point of saving faith, not at the point of water baptism, which usually occurs later.  But if a person is already justified and has sins forgiven eternally at the point of saving faith, then baptism is not necessary for forgiveness  of sins, or for the bestowal of new spiritual life.

Baptism, then, is not necessary for salvation.  But it is necessary if we are to be obedient to Christ, for he commanded baptism for all who believe in him."

If you like what you read, please subscribe via RSS or E-mail for free today. If you have some feedback, please leave a comment below. All comments are welcome.
Enhanced by Zemanta